<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarifying your definitions of high achievement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachaelashe.com/2009/04/08/clarifying-your-definitions-of-high-achievement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachaelashe.com/2009/04/08/clarifying-your-definitions-of-high-achievement/</link>
	<description>The art of Rachael Ashe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://rachaelashe.com/2009/04/08/clarifying-your-definitions-of-high-achievement/comment-page-1/#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachaelashe.com/?p=473#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you on the craftmanship of a rolex. For me though, the most important line of the whole horoscope is about clarifying my own definitions of high achievement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you on the craftmanship of a rolex. For me though, the most important line of the whole horoscope is about clarifying my own definitions of high achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Marshall</title>
		<link>http://rachaelashe.com/2009/04/08/clarifying-your-definitions-of-high-achievement/comment-page-1/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachaelashe.com/?p=473#comment-7217</guid>
		<description>I have to say that in the world of Prestige Wristwatches, Rolex have done a lot of good things. If you take a Rolex of itself, it is a wonderful example of brilliant craftmanship certified to the highest standard. Personally, I would not choose to buy a Rolex, there are plenty of others I&#039;d put first. As a measure of success I think it depends. If I was financially successful I WOULD indulge in expensive wristwatches - not from status, but because I think they are an amazingly interesting item. Those who judge others by a Rolex and not the Rolex itself probably say more about themselves than they do about Rolex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that in the world of Prestige Wristwatches, Rolex have done a lot of good things. If you take a Rolex of itself, it is a wonderful example of brilliant craftmanship certified to the highest standard. Personally, I would not choose to buy a Rolex, there are plenty of others I&#8217;d put first. As a measure of success I think it depends. If I was financially successful I WOULD indulge in expensive wristwatches &#8211; not from status, but because I think they are an amazingly interesting item. Those who judge others by a Rolex and not the Rolex itself probably say more about themselves than they do about Rolex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

